Brand Findings
Mits Air MITSWZ-40EC is Illegal and Non-Compliant
Failure to be Listed in the NRCan Searchable Product List
In Canada, all air-conditioning and heat-pump systems must be listed in the NRCan database. It is illegal to import or sell a unit that is not listed. At the time of this publication, March 16, 2026, the Mits Air MITSWZ-40EC cannot be located in the NRCan Searchable Product List under any product category — not as a Room Air Conditioner, not as a Heat Pump, and not even as a PTHP.
Failure to Meet NRCan Minimum Efficiency Requirements
Mits Air MITSWZ-40EC has a claimed nominal cooling capacity of 12,030 BTU and a claimed heating capacity of 11,970 BTU. Under federal law, any unit in this class must meet one of the following minimum efficiency thresholds to be legally sold, installed, or used in Canada:
- As a Heat Pump: 13.4 SEER2 for cooling and 5.4 HSPF2 for heating
- As a Room Air Conditioner: 9.3 CEER (rising to 13.7 CEER effective May 26, 2026)
Mits Air publishes neither a SEER2, nor a CEER, nor an HSPF2. Unlike most brands in this report that at least attempt to publish some form of efficiency data — however fraudulent or mislabeled — Mits Air publishes only cooling capacity in BTU and power input in watts. No SEER2. No CEER. No HSPF2. No EER. No COP. Nothing.
This is not a shortcut or a simplification. It is a complete failure to comply with federal law, and it raises an obvious question: if the unit's efficiency were genuinely competitive, why would Mits Air choose not to publish it?
This alone renders the unit illegal, regardless of any other violation.
What the Published Data Actually Shows
Although Mits Air declines to publish an efficiency rating, its own capacity and wattage figures allow the efficiency to be calculated directly.
In Cooling
- Cooling Capacity: 12,030 BTU
- Power Input: 1,209 W
Using Mits Air's own published figures: 12,030 ÷ 1,209 = EER 9.95. CEER is always lower than EER, so while the requirement is 9.3 CEER, it’s possible this unit can achieve 9.3 CEER based on the numbers they publish. However, that is a big if, because it assumes the unit can actually achieve 12,030 with only 1,209 watts of power, which is impossible.
In Heating
- Heating Capacity: 11,970 BTU
- Power Input: 947 W
Using Mits Air's own published figures: 11,970 ÷ 3.412 ÷ 947 = COP 3.70. COP is not a legal rating for this product category. The required metric is HSPF2. Units achieving a COP of approximately 3.70 at rated conditions typically meet the required 5.4 HSPF2 minimum when properly tested under AHRI 210/240 conditions across multiple climate zones.
The Zymbo Connection
Zymbo manufactures the Mits Air MITSWZ-40EC, the same model on which the Zymbo WZ-40EC is based. The hardware is identical: same compressor, same coil geometry, same refrigerant charge, same airflow path, same chassis. The only difference is the name on the front panel.
Zymbo's published specifications for this platform have been independently verified as fabricated, as detailed in the Zymbo WZ-40EC section of this report. Mits Air chose not to reproduce Zymbo's fake EER and COP values, instead leaving the efficiency fields blank. This may reflect an awareness that Zymbo's numbers are mathematically indefensible. But omitting the ratings entirely is itself a federal violation — and it does nothing to change the fact that the underlying hardware cannot meet Canadian efficiency standards, regardless of brand name.
Illegal Misclassification
The MITSWZ-40EC does not meet any classification because it has no rating. This is illegal.
Regulatory Violation Summary: Mits Air — MITSWZ-40EC
This product is illegal to distribute, specify, install, or use in Canada. The MITSWZ-40EC publishes no efficiency rating of any kind — no SEER2, no CEER, no HSPF2, no EER, and no COP. A product that refuses to publish any efficiency data cannot be evaluated, certified, or legally sold. Furthermore, the MITSWZ-40EC uses identical hardware to the Zymbo Dolphin 40, a product whose published specifications have been independently proven to be fabricated.
No Efficiency Data Published | ||
|---|---|---|
Required Metric | Purpose | MITSWZ-40EC Status |
SEER2 | Mandatory cooling efficiency rating for heat pumps | ❌ Not published |
HSPF2 | Mandatory heating efficiency rating for heat pumps | ❌ Not published |
CEER | Mandatory cooling efficiency rating for room air conditioners | ❌ Not published |
EER | Basic cooling efficiency reference point | ❌ Not published |
COP | Basic heating efficiency reference point | ❌ Not published |
The complete absence of any efficiency data is not an oversight. It is a material omission that prevents regulators, dealers, specifiers, and consumers from evaluating whether this product meets any applicable standard. Under the Competition Act, a material omission is treated the same as a false statement.
Faking Test Results | ||
|---|---|---|
Violation | US Law Violated | Canadian Law Violated |
Mits Air failed to use any recognized testing methodology — no legitimate efficiency rating for the MITSWZ-40EC has ever been produced | 10 CFR Part 429/430 | Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 |
The MITSWZ-40EC uses identical hardware to the Zymbo Dolphin 40, whose published specifications have been independently proven to be fabricated — meaning the underlying performance claims for this hardware are known to be false | 10 CFR Part 429/430; 18 U.S.C. § 1001 | Energy Efficiency Act; Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 |
The complete absence of any published efficiency data makes it impossible to verify compliance with any applicable standard, and is itself evidence that no compliant testing has been conducted | 10 CFR Part 429/430 | Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 |
Selling a Product That Should Not Be on the Market | ||
|---|---|---|
Violation | US Law Violated | Canadian Law Violated |
MITSWZ-40EC does not meet minimum efficiency standards — no certified data exists to demonstrate compliance with any applicable efficiency threshold | 10 CFR Part 430 | MEPS under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 |
Mits Air never listed the MITSWZ-40EC on NRCan's searchable product database, meaning the product was never legally cleared for import or interprovincial sale in Canada | — | NRCan Searchable Product Database; Energy Efficiency Act |
MITSWZ-40EC was never certified by an accredited certification body and does not carry the mandatory compliance mark | DOE Certification under 10 CFR Part 429 | Standards Council of Canada Energy Efficiency Verification Mark |
Mits Air never filed the required compliance reports with regulators before importing or selling the MITSWZ-40EC | DOE via CCMS | NRCan Energy Efficiency Report |
Lying to Customers and Regulators | ||
|---|---|---|
Violation | US Law Violated | Canadian Law Violated |
Mits Air markets and sells the MITSWZ-40EC while deliberately withholding all efficiency data, preventing customers from making an informed purchasing decision | 10 CFR Part 429.12; 18 U.S.C. § 1001 — federal criminal offence | Energy Efficiency Act — fines up to $10,000 per violation |
Product literature and marketing materials violate classification and labeling requirements by omitting all mandatory efficiency metrics | FTC Energy Labeling Rule, 16 CFR Part 305; DOE Labeling Requirements under 10 CFR Part 430 | NRCan Product Classification and EnerGuide Labeling Requirements under Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 |
By using hardware identical to the Zymbo Dolphin 40 — a product with proven fabricated specifications — Mits Air misrepresents the performance capability of the MITSWZ-40EC to customers, dealers, regulators, and certification bodies | 18 U.S.C. § 1001 — federal criminal offense | Energy Efficiency Act offense |
Breaking Consumer Protection and Competition Laws | ||
|---|---|---|
Violation | US Law Violated | Canadian Law Violated |
The complete omission of all efficiency data, combined with the use of hardware with proven fabricated specifications, constitutes a false or misleading representation in a material respect, exposing Mits Air to regulatory action and civil lawsuits | FTC Act Section 5, 15 U.S.C. § 45; Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) | Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34 |
Under the Competition Act, a material omission — such as the deliberate withholding of all efficiency data — is treated the same as a false statement and is equally actionable | — | Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34 |
Maximum penalties for serious violations or refusal to take corrective action | FTC civil penalties up to $53,088 per violation | Energy Efficiency Act fines $10,000–$200,000 |